<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Verified Page at claimID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/</link>
	<description>Manage your online identity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: http://afree87.livejournal.com/</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-15565</link>
		<dc:creator>http://afree87.livejournal.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-15565</guid>
		<description>My main issue with it is that I have NoScript, and when I load the /verified page without enabling JS for claimid.com, it just looks like the regular page. I assume that other lightweight browsers such as Dillo and W3M, and other browsers with Javascript disabled, will see the same thing. The URL /verified seems to suggest that it will load a totally different set of information by default.

Although, I recognize that this is just nitpicking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main issue with it is that I have NoScript, and when I load the /verified page without enabling JS for claimid.com, it just looks like the regular page. I assume that other lightweight browsers such as Dillo and W3M, and other browsers with Javascript disabled, will see the same thing. The URL /verified seems to suggest that it will load a totally different set of information by default.</p>
<p>Although, I recognize that this is just nitpicking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrell Russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-15551</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrell Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-15551</guid>
		<description>The search engines will definitely find that information - that said, we&#039;re displaying mostly for human consumption, and the javascript seemed more elegant.  Of course, we&#039;re always willing to talk more about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The search engines will definitely find that information &#8211; that said, we&#8217;re displaying mostly for human consumption, and the javascript seemed more elegant.  Of course, we&#8217;re always willing to talk more about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://afree87.livejournal.com/</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-15529</link>
		<dc:creator>http://afree87.livejournal.com/</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-15529</guid>
		<description>Why does the /verified page load with JavaScript? It should be Google accessible too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the /verified page load with JavaScript? It should be Google accessible too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-15441</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-15441</guid>
		<description>Great stuff, option found a changed. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff, option found a changed. <img src='http://blog.claimid.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beta</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-14961</link>
		<dc:creator>Beta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-14961</guid>
		<description>Alistair, In case you didn&#039;t notice, there is a new option under account settings, &quot;Display my verified OpenID accounts:&quot;

I do agree with Alistair, this option should probably default to disabled by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alistair, In case you didn&#8217;t notice, there is a new option under account settings, &#8220;Display my verified OpenID accounts:&#8221;</p>
<p>I do agree with Alistair, this option should probably default to disabled by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-14863</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-14863</guid>
		<description>Crikey, it appears that the OpenIDs will now be published by doing this.

It is generally not advised to publicise these for security reasons, and I don&#039;t want someone to google my anonymous OpenID to find out who I am. I have removed my OpenIDs for now and I strongly recommending not showing them publicly unless a user explicitly asks to have it shown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crikey, it appears that the OpenIDs will now be published by doing this.</p>
<p>It is generally not advised to publicise these for security reasons, and I don&#8217;t want someone to google my anonymous OpenID to find out who I am. I have removed my OpenIDs for now and I strongly recommending not showing them publicly unless a user explicitly asks to have it shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Old Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Verified Page at claimID</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-14775</link>
		<dc:creator>This Old Network &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New Verified Page at claimID</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-14775</guid>
		<description>[...] rolled out Verified Pages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rolled out Verified Pages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claimID: Verification of Identities at Not So Relevant</title>
		<link>http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/comment-page-1/#comment-14771</link>
		<dc:creator>claimID: Verification of Identities at Not So Relevant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.claimid.com/2007/02/new-verified-page-at-claimid/#comment-14771</guid>
		<description>[...] belong to you. Also it is another piece of a puzzle for building online reputation. But I better quote the claimID folks themselves: This allows us to really begin to tap into the power of distributed identity and maybe even hint [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] belong to you. Also it is another piece of a puzzle for building online reputation. But I better quote the claimID folks themselves: This allows us to really begin to tap into the power of distributed identity and maybe even hint [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

